He is valid, however, to leave clearly, that it is not treated here to make critical to some didactic procedure, as is the case of expositivas lessons, resource frequently used still in the current days, and that when made of adjusted form, becomes an efficient resource. The education model that to our way to think, does not pass of mere pretension, is that one that already was denounced for Scrates (470-399 B.C.). In the book ' ' The Repblica' ' , Plato registered severe critical the done ones for Scrates to the Sofistas, for oratria searched carefully its, that for times, contained only half truths. In this process, the interlocutors only received passively the message without the chance to question. Therefore, it is necessary to think that nor everything that if says in way pretty and of elegant form it must be considered as truth. What if it perceives in the education offered for the sofistas, is that did not have opening for the dialogue. So that it has freedom for education is necessary to prevent that education that it aims at to catequizar, to dogmatizar the people, or, also an elitist and authoritarian education, that it looks to silence the other. For Freire (1996), as much one how much to the other they are harmful and alienator, and steals a right vital of that they search and they wait of the school the space to develop and to exert its freedom.
Being thus, it does not have, therefore, possibility of intervention and transformation in the world, therefore the freedom for the dialogue is necessary. It is in the school that if comes across with the plurality of ideas, different conceptions of world, and the most diverse cultures. From there the legitimate necessity of the dialogue, in reason of the men to have the necessity of if sociabilizar, learning to live together, to learn to live with the others (DELORS, 2001, P. .